Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Republicans, not Democrats, ended budget negotiations

Senator Bob Huff (R – Diamond Bar) engaged in a cringe-inducing psychological projection when he accused Democrats of having signed a labor pledge to “spend ‘til it hurts.” The irony couldn’t be more astounding, as nearly every Republican California legislator has signed a written promise to Washington, DC lobbyist Grover Norquist to not support taxes regardless of how great the need.

To believe it was Democrats, not Republicans, who ended the budget negotiations yesterday, you would have to overlook quite a bit:

• You would have to ignore the anti-tax ad campaigns that began running in two Republican Senators’ districts who seemed they might support placing revenue extensions on the ballot for voters to decide.

• You would have to ignore the threat at the recent California Republican Party convention not to fund or support any Republican candidate who supported the people’s right to vote.

• You would have to ignore the Republican Party’s threat to label as “traitors” (yes, traitors!) any Republican who supported putting a tax extension on the ballot.

• You would have to ignore Grover Norquist’s assertion that supporting the people’s right to vote on a tax is the same as supporting the tax.

• You would have to ignore the 6-page, 53-item special interest wish list that the Republicans submitted as the price of 4 of their votes.

In other words, you'd have to deny quite a bit of reality.

Let's put this in the context of national events and what is happening here to the California Republican Party. The party is a mere shadow of its former self in a state that has historically elected Republicans. Its radical agenda simply does not have the support of Californians. Registration in the California Republican Party is at an historic low. Less than a third of registered California voters are Republicans. Both houses in the Legislature are only 2 seats short of a Democratic supermajority. No Republican holds statewide office. The voters recently and resoundingly rejected Republicans Meg Whitman for Governor and Carly Fiorina for US Senate, despite their record spending.

While California continues to reject Republican candidates, the party continues to push their candidates further to the right. With the influence of radical tea partiers on the rise and the upcoming “top two” primary system projected to increase party-loyalist dependence, it is becoming increasingly impossible for moderate Republicans to be elected.

The failure of Republicans to participate in the difficult decisions necessary to guide California through the greatest economic challenge since the Great Depression is quite simply a failure of leadership on their part. As a member of a staunchly Republican family, it pains me to see the demise of this once-great party. As a Democrat worried about the future of our great state, it pains me that my Republican colleagues refuse to be partners in solving our problems. As a legislator, I believe the choices we now face, as Democrats make these decisions on our own, are grim. The budget cuts we must make in order to close the remaining $15 billion budget gap will cause enormous suffering throughout the state. They will raise the unemployment rate and add to our economic pain. They will impair our ability to borrow, costing us all more in the long run. Schools will close, roads will deteriorate, and public safety will diminish as local communities lay off teachers, road crews, police officers, and firefighters.

In times of great societal peril, it is necessary for us to put partisanship aside and make difficult decisions for our greater good. Now is the time for us to behave as Californians, not as Democrats or Republicans. It is truly saddening to see my colleagues put their party ahead of our state.

Note: To see where tax revenues and expenditures are coming from and where they're being spent, see these maps below:



Thursday, March 10, 2011

Unshared sacrifice

So far, I have supported Governor Brown's budget proposal. I believe he is indeed taking a mature and realistic approach in trying to balance our budget under these most difficult circumstances.

We like to talk about "shared sacrifice" in addressing this crisis, but let's not delude ourselves – the sacrifice is not actually being shared. In fact, the sacrifice is almost exclusively being asked of our children and grandchildren. Add in the elderly and the disabled for good measure and you've identified almost everyone who is sharing in the sacrifice. Now, retirees and public servants are about to be thrown onto the pile.

The Conference Committee has adopted most of the Governor’s budget proposals. Here are some of the $12.5 billion in cuts adopted thus far; you’ll notice many directly or indirectly affect children:

  • Childcare: $716 million reduction - Includes reducing the number of preschool slots by 15%
  • Higher Education: $500 million cut from California State University, $500 million cut from University of California, and $400 million cut from Community Colleges
  • Health and Human Services: $6 billion cut, including:
    - Department of Developmental Services: $500 million cut from services to developmentally-disabled children and adults
    - CalWORKS: $1.1 billion from this program providing aid to poor, single parents
    - Medi-Cal: $1.6 billion cut in healthcare services for extremely poor families
  • State Civil Servants: $700 million cut


Additionally, our state parks have historically been underfunded and under-maintained for years and this year will be the worst to come. These parks preserve California’s rich history and natural resources. They also used to serve as a remote classroom for our state’s children – an important function often overlooked. Now, however, many are closed part time, and many will completely shut down due to budget cuts.

Even the most promising option for our children to make a better life for themselves – obtaining a college education – has become more and more difficult. Fees and tuition at all three of California’s higher education systems (California State University, University of California, and Community Colleges) have risen dramatically in recent years.

One-fifth of California’s children are living in poverty. Across the nation, income inequality is at record levels – wealth has become concentrated so that 1% of our population owns more than 20% of the total wealth. Yet, we have reduced corporate taxes repeatedly over the past two decades. We cannot even summon the political will to tax the extraction of a state resource – oil – even though the oil companies continue to earn record profits routinely.

So, let's proceed to do what we have to do under the circumstances. But let’s not pretend that we are all sharing the pain. Our budget cutting has consistently and disproportionately hurt our youth.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Preservation or degradation of state services? Let the people speak.

This is an Op-Ed I wrote that appeared in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat.

Preservation or degradation of state services? Let the people speak.
California State Senator Noreen Evans
Second Senatorial District


The design of California’s commemorative state quarter and the ongoing budget debate in Sacramento might seem unrelated. However, when twenty Californians sat down to deliberate upon what image would best depict the spirit of the Golden State, they settled upon the now-familiar relief of California’s founding naturalist John Muir gazing towards Yosemite’s Half Dome with a soaring condor overhead.

Our state parks protect our natural splendors and allow not only Californians, but countless individuals from around the world to marvel at their magnificence. Parks also preserve our state’s history in a way no textbook can and serve as an invaluable teaching tool for our youth. With years of deferred maintenance, reduced days of operation, increased usage fees, and staff reductions -- make no mistake about it -- we have already surpassed “belt-tightening” within the parks. The reality is, this year’s budget goes beyond mere belt-tightening and will result in park closures for the first time ever in our state’s history.

As painful as this is to our legacy of preservation, it is an example of the level of sacrifice necessary to deliver a serious budget that is on-time, balanced, and takes real steps toward putting California’s fiscal house in order. This cut will be particularly painful to the people of our Second Senatorial District, as it contains approximately one-fifth of all our state parks.

The budget being crafted by Governor Brown and Legislative Democrats contains a mix of expenditure reductions and the continuation of current tax rates set to expire this year. As promised by Brown throughout his gubernatorial campaign, these tax mechanisms will not be enacted without voter approval. Governor Brown wants the voters to decide – do we cut our state services to the bone (and then some) and continue our current tax rates, or do we revert to lower tax rates that will require cutting state services at a truly unprecedented and unpredictable level?

Other Democratic legislators and I agree with Governor Brown - let the people vote. However, before the people can vote, the provisions must be placed on the ballot, which requires a two-thirds vote of the Legislature. Since a majority of Republican legislators have pledged to not allow the voters to be heard on these provisions, it is unclear if voters will have the chance to decide their budgeting future. To my Republican colleagues I say – let the people vote!

For much of our modern history, California’s quality of life has been the envy of the world. Perhaps it’s the weather, our unmatched public university systems, the robust and creative industries of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, or maybe even the preservation and accessibility of our state’s natural beauty. Whatever “it” is, Californians call a very special place “home” and deserve to vote on the future of our home before the only image our children can enjoy of their state’s proud tradition is on the back of a quarter.

State Senator Noreen Evans represents the Second Senatorial District, including all or portions of the Counties of Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Napa, Solano, and Sonoma. She is Chair of the Senate Committee on Judiciary and the Legislative Women’s Caucus.